Steven Howell
Plaintiff hired Defendant to design and install a commercial vehicle wrap for Plaintiff’s business. Defendant represented and guaranteed that the finished wrap would match the approved mock-up design provided to Plaintiff. Plaintiff relied on Defendant’s representations and paid Defendant for the services. However, the final product delivered by Defendant was materially defective and did not match the approved design, including but not limited to: • Incorrect logo representation • Improper layout and design execution • Failure to match agreed-upon mock-up • Poor workmanship and installation quality Plaintiff notified Defendant of the deficiencies and requested correction or a refund. Defendant refused and/or failed to provide a refund or adequately correct the defective work. As a result, the vehicle wrap is unusable for its intended professional and branding purposes. Bubbles, peeling, holes, and lines folds and seams all done incorrect. He had design since jan 22nd didnt match
