
Ericksen Krentel CPAs and Consultants: Trusted, long‑standing accounting and consulting in New Orleans.
No reviews yet
Ericksen Krentel CPAs and Consultants provides accounting and financial consulting from 4227 Canal St, New Orleans. The firm is noted by long-time clients for high-quality work over more than a decade, though reviews also include a negative account of retainer billing and a claimed conflict of interest. This mix of feedback positions the firm as a local option for professional accounting guidance.
No photos available
Professional assessment of business worth for sales, mergers, or legal purposes.
Comprehensive tax strategy and filing services for individuals and businesses.
Accurate financial record-keeping and reporting to ensure compliance and clarity.
Strategic advice on financial management, investments, and business growth.
Independent verification of financial statements for credibility and transparency.
Claim Ericksen Krentel CPAs and Consultants to update business info, respond to reviews, and access analytics.
Steve Hunter
Ericksen Krentel have been my accountants for just over a decade now. I have been entirely satisfied with the quality of work they have provided for all these years.
Gentilly Terrace
I hired this firm to value a business, paid a $5,000 retainer, received a bill for over $3,000 with entries that read "work on case" despite that I received not one single document and nothing close to the valuation that I paid for. I fired them and hired another firm who got to work and did the job. Despite REPEATED, WRITTEN, requests, I did not receive the return of the unused portion of my retainer. I received absolutely nothing of any value for my $5,000. And even more egregious is the fact that someone in their office was the family member of the opposing counsel in my case and they knowingly allowed this person to "work on" my case. It was a grave conflict of interest. They basically took my $5,000 and gave me nothing in return but showed my file to opposing counsel's daughter. There should be disciplinary action for this.